Punti di forza

• L’ingegneria sociale nei servizi di assistenza è ormai diventata uno dei principali punti di accesso, con gli attacchi di vishing (phishing vocale) in rapido aumento che portano alla compromissione delle credenziali.
• Le identità non umane, come gli account di servizio e i token, rappresentano un grave punto cieco in termini di sicurezza: spesso non vengono gestite e sono oggetto di gravi abusi finalizzati al movimento laterale.
• Active Directory (AD) rappresenta un obiettivo di grande valore a causa del suo controllo centralizzato e delle potenziali configurazioni errate.
• La prevenzione da sola non basta; le organizzazioni hanno bisogno di solide capacità di rilevamento e di ripristino rapido per limitare i danni.
• Immediate operational actions – like auditing accounts and correlating help desk activity with identity changes – can significantly reduce risk.

AD rimane uno degli obiettivi principali degli hacker poiché è il fulcro della gestione delle identità aziendali.Ricerche recenti dimostrano cheil 67% degli incidenti comporta ormai una compromissione legata alle identità, with attackers going after critical systems like AD within hours of initial access.Once compromised, recovery can take days or weeks – causing significant business disruption.
The question worth asking isn’t whether AD is a target.It’s how attackers get tqui – and why the path is so much shorter than security teams might expect.

3 passi verso un compromesso completo

Gruppi di malintenzionati come ShinyHunters e Scattered Spider hanno trasformato l’ingegneria sociale in un’operazione su larga scala.Voice phishing – vishing – jumped 449% in 2025.I chiamanti vengono reclutati, istruiti su copioni prestabiliti epagati fino a 1.000 dollari depending on success and hit rate.
That means, it’s possible to start an attack with one step: Get a password reset or multi-factor authentication (MFA) change.That’s it.
From that single credential, the attacker moves laterally into cloud and virtualized environments.They harvest OAuth tokens, create new administrative service accounts, and embed access in machine-layer credentials.These non-human identities – service accounts, API keys, tokens – now outnumber human users 144 to 1.La proliferazione e i costi operativi rendono difficili la rotazione e l’audit. Quel movimento laterale ha una destinazione: Active Directory.

La pubblicità è l’obiettivo

AD is the central nervous system of enterprise identity.Control it and you control everything – user accounts, group policies, and access to every domain-joined system in the network.The reason it’s so attractive to attackers – and so difficult to defend – is structural.Any authenticated user can read the entire directory.Every domain-joined system inherits trust from it.
Group Policy Objects linked at the domain head can be weaponized to disable security controls outright.Legacy protocols left enabled for application compatibility provide straightforward access.Microsoft’s own documentation says that “most identity attacks utilize common misconfigurations in Active Directory.”

When an attacker reaches the AD, they don’t need to force entry.The door is usually open.

La prevenzione è necessaria ma non sufficiente

The standard security stack – MFA, endpoint detection, email filtering – is built around human behavior.It wasn’t designed to govern the machine identity layer or to detect the kind of slow, legitimate-looking privilege escalation that characterizes modern AD attacks.An attacker that moves from a compromised human account to a service account to a domain administrator over 72 hours may never trigger a single alert.
This is why the conversation must shift from prevention-first to recovery-first.
Prevention still matters.Least-privilege access, auditing AD changes, hardening default configurations, disabling inactive accounts – these can help reduce the attack surface.But given that half of organizations have already experienced an AD attack, designing only for prevention means designing to fail.
True identity resilience requires the ability to detect unauthorized privilege escalations in near real time, roll back malicious changes before they propagate, and restore the identity environment to a known-trusted state quickly – not in days or weeks, but fast enough to contain the blast radius.That means treating AD and the non-human identity layer as Tier 0 assets, with the same governance and recovery investment you’d apply to any other mission-critical system.

Cosa fare subito per rafforzare la resilienza dell’identità

The gap between wqui most organizations are and wqui they need to be on identity resilience is real.But it’s closeable.The immediate priorities are unglamorous and operational:

1. Audit what’s in your AD.
2. Find the accounts that shouldn’t still exist.
3. Rotate the credentials that haven’t been touched in years.
4. Correlare l’attività dell’help desk con gli eventi relativi alla creazione di token e account.

A help desk interaction followed by an MFA reset followed by a new service account is a high-confidence attack signal – and it’s detectable if you’re looking for it.
The longer-term work is architectural: Build recovery capability into your identity program so that when an attack succeeds – and it’s usually when, not if – you can contain it, reverse it, and try to restore trust faster than the attacker can consolidate their position.
Attackers are counting on your AD being ungoverned, your machine identities being invisible, and your recovery plan being theoretical.Close one of those gaps this quarter.Close all three and you’ve fundamentally changed the math. 

: dalla valutazione delle vulnerabilità al rollback con un solo clic, fino al ripristino completo della foresta.
Recentemente ho partecipato al podcast STRIVE insieme a Vidya Shankaran per parlare del divario di governance relativo alle identità non umane. Ascolta la nostra puntata – from vulnerability assessment to one-click rollback and full forest recovery.
I recently joined Vidya Shankaran on the STRIVE podcast to talk about the governance gap for non-human identities.Check out our episode qui.And be sure to read Vidya’s blog, Il punto cieco dell’identità delle macchine è ormai diventato una delle principali superfici di attacco.

Domande frequenti

Q: Why are help desks becoming a major security risk?

A: Help desks are often trusted to reset passwords and modify MFA settings, making them attractive targets for social engineering.Attackers exploit this trust to gain initial access with minimal resistance.
Q: What role do non-human identities play in attacks?

A: Sprawl and operational overhead make rotation and audit of non-human identities, such as service accounts and API keys, difficult.Attackers use them to maintain persistence and move undetected across systems.
Q: Why is AD such a critical target?

A: AD controls authentication and access across the network.Gaining control of it allows attackers to manage users, policies, and systems at scale.
Q: Isn’t MFA and endpoint security enough to stop these attacks?

A: These tools focus on human behavior and may not detect slow, legitimate-looking privilege escalation.Attackers can operate within normal patterns and avoid triggering alerts.
Q: What does a recovery-first security approach mean?

A: It means preparing for the reality that breaches will happen and prioritizing the ability to detect, contain, and reverse them quickly.This approach helps reduce downtime and can help limit overall impact.
Q: What are the most important steps to take immediately?

A: Start by auditing your AD, removing unnecessary accounts, rotating old credentials, and monitoring for suspicious sequences of help desk and identity-related activities.
Dan Conrad is Principal Technologist and Field CTO at Commvault.

Punti di forza

• La migrazione delle macchine virtuali a Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization è un percorso graduale che richiede una protezione costante in tutti gli ambienti ibridi.
• Una platform unificata e nativa di Kubernetes per la protezione dei dati platform ridurre la complessità ed elimina la necessità di ricorrere a strumenti o processi separati.
• Reliable resilience – including immutable backups and threat detection – is critical during migration, when risks are highest.
• Le opzioni di ripristino flessibili consentono alle organizzazioni di adattarsi rapidamente in caso di fallimento delle fasi di migrazione o di variazioni delle tempistiche.
• Il consolidamento della protezione per le macchine virtuali e i container contribuisce a ridurre la proliferazione degli strumenti e a garantire una governance coerente.

If you’re an IT leader today, chances are your virtualization strategy is under active review.

Rising costs, licensing uncertainty, and long-term vendor lock-in have many organizations reassessing their reliance on traditional hypervisors. At the same time, Kubernetes has matured into the operational foundation for modern applications.

These two realities are converging – and for many enterprises, Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is emerging as a preferred destination for running virtual machines within a Kubernetes-native operating model.

This transition is accelerating across industries. As organizations modernize infrastructure on their own terms, Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is increasingly viewed as a way to modernize the platform without the need for application refactoring. With that momentum comes a critical question:

How do you migrate virtual machines while maintaining consistent protection, resilience, and recoverability throughout the process?

To answer it, you need to examine how most enterprise migrations actually unfold – and where protection and resilience become critical.

La migrazione è un percorso, non un evento isolato

Seasoned IT leaders know that infrastructure transitions rarely happen all at once.

For enterprises opting to move from hypervisors like VMware to Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, the transition typically unfolds in phases. During this time, organizations inevitably operate in a mixed state:

• Le macchine virtuali basate su VMware continuano a supportare le operazioni aziendali fondamentali.
• Macchine virtuali che girano da poco su Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.
• Applicazioni in container che condividono gli stessi cluster Red Hat OpenShift.

This coexistence period introduces complexity and risk. Data is in motion, environments are changing, and protection gaps can appear if tooling and processes don’t evolve alongside workloads.

È fondamentale garantire una protezione affidabile

Commvault offre da tempo soluzioni di protezione e ripristino dei dati sia per gli ambienti VMware che per i carichi di lavoro Kubernetes in esecuzione su Red Hat OpenShift. Lo stesso modello di protezione nativo per Kubernetes e basato su policy si estende ora alle macchine virtuali in esecuzione su Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization. Ciò che colpisce davvero i clienti è la coerenza:

• Un’unica platform la protezione e il ripristino.
• Operazioni basate su criteri applicate in modo uniforme a tutti i carichi di lavoro.
• Progettato per integrarsi con gli strumenti e i processi già in uso, al passo con l’evoluzione degli ambienti.

VMs running on Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization are protected using the same workflows and governance constructs as containerized applications. This unified approach is being embraced by organizations standardizing on Red Hat OpenShift that want a simpler, more consistent way to manage data across environments.

This capability is available today.Commvault Cloudsupporta la protezione degli ambienti Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization in linea con la versione 11.40 (Long-Term Support) e la versione 11.42 (Innovation), il che significa che i clienti possono già implementare queste funzionalità in produzione.

You Shouldn’t Need to Manage Protection Differently

Once VMs move to Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, they shouldn’t require special handling from a protection standpoint.

Commvault Cloud discovers and protects Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization VMs alongside containerized applications, helping give teams centralized visibility, consistent policy enforcement, and simplified recovery operations. Virtualized and containerized workloads are managed together – without introducing operational silos.

For organizations managing diverse application portfolios, this treatment of VMs inside Kubernetes helps reduce operational friction while maintaining enterprise-grade controls.

La resilienza informatica è fondamentale quando la migrazione aumenta i rischi.

I periodi di migrazione rappresentano una fase particolarmente vulnerabile. Il cambiamento genera complessità, e la complessità aumenta l’esposizione alla perdita di dati e al ransomware. Commvault Cloud garantire la resilienza durante questa fase grazie a:

• Backup isolati fisicamente e immutabili per i carichi di lavoro di Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.
• Dati di backup che supportano la ricerca delle minacce e l’analisi forense, aiutando i team a verificare la prontezza al ripristino prima di ripristinare i carichi di lavoro.
• Advanced recovery capabilities designed to help organizations minimize operational disruption.

Che i carichi di lavoro si trovino in fase di pre-migrazione, nel bel mezzo della transizione o già pienamente operativi su Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, il livello di resilienza rimane invariato.

La flessibilità nel recupero infonde fiducia

Every modernization initiative needs room for adjustment.

Commvault supports both in-place and out-of-place recovery for Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization virtual machines, including full VM context and configuration. If a migration step doesn’t go as planned – or timelines need to shift – teams may recover quickly and move forward without compromising availability or data integrity.

Protezione nativa per Kubernetes oltre le macchine virtuali

Per molte aziende, la virtualizzazione rappresenta solo una parte di una strategia più ampia di modernizzazione delle applicazioni. Commvault Cloud offre Cloud una protezione incentrata sulle applicazioni e nativa per Kubernetes per i carichi di lavoro containerizzati, inclusi i volumi persistenti e i metadati delle applicazioni, su tutte le distribuzioni Kubernetes certificate dal CNCF. Ciò garantisce la mobilità e il ripristino delle applicazioni cloud, contribuendo al contempo a mantenere la coerenza operativa tra i diversi ambienti.

Ridurre la proliferazione degli strumenti man mano che l’infrastruttura si evolve

Platform transitions often introduce new tools, new processes – and new complexity.

By using Commvault Cloud as a unified protection platform for:

• Macchine virtuali VMware.
• Macchine virtuali (VM) di Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.
• Applicazioni in container.

Le organizzazioni possono contribuire a ridurre la proliferazione degli strumenti, semplificare l’amministrazione e garantire una governance coerente anche man mano che le strategie infrastrutturali si evolvono.

Come tutto si incastra

During any migration, it helps to understand how the pieces work together. Red Hat’s Migration Toolkit for Virtualization takes care of moving VMs from VMware into Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.

Commvault Cloud helps provide the protection and resilience that stays with your workloads throughout the process, so data can remain protected before, during, and after migration. This can help keep recoverability from falling behind as workloads move.

Continuing the Conversation at Red Hat Summit

We’re already working with customers that are actively moving virtual machines onto OpenShift Virtualization – and we’re continuing these discussions at Red Hat Summit, May 11–14 in Atlanta.

At the Commvault booth, we’ll be:

• Un dialogo con i responsabili IT sulle sfide concrete in materia di resilienza.
• Consigli pratici per affrontare la migrazione con fiducia.
• Dimostrazione Cloud Commvault Cloud per Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.

If maintaining resilience and recoverability throughout your virtualization strategy is a priority, we’d welcome the opportunity to connect.

Andare avanti con fiducia

Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is becoming a foundational component of modern enterprise infrastructure. But you can’t rush migration at any cost; you must build protection, resilience, and recovery into the process from the beginning.

With Commvault Cloud, protecting Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization workloads isn’t a future aspiration. It’s something customers already are doing – using a unified platform to modernize confidently while staying resilient and recoverable.

“Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization delivers a reliable, consistent foundation for organizations to support their entire virtualized estate,” says Steve Gordon, Senior Director, Product Management, Hybrid Cloud Platforms, at Red Hat. “By leveraging an optimized integration like Commvault Cloud with Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, our customers can move forward with greater confidence, knowing their workloads are protected consistently before, during, and after migration.”

Domande frequenti

Q: Why is VM migration considered a multi-phase process?

A: Most enterprises cannot migrate all workloads at once, so they operate in a hybrid state with legacy and new environments running simultaneously. This phased approach introduces complexity, making consistent protection and visibility essential throughout the transition.

Q: What role does resilience play during VM migration?

A: Resilience enables organizations to maintain data protection, recover quickly from failures, and defend against threats like ransomware. During migration, when systems are in flux, strong resilience measures can help prevent data loss and operational disruption.

Q: How does Commvault Cloud simplify protection across environments?

A: Commvault Cloud provides a single platform with policy-driven protection for VMware VMs, OpenShift Virtualization VMs, and containerized applications. This unified approach enables consistent operations without introducing new tools or workflows.

Q: What makes Kubernetes-native protection important?

A: Kubernetes-native protection aligns with how modern applications are deployed and managed, covering both containers and virtual machines. It enables simple data management, mobility, and recovery within cloud-native environments.

Q: How does recovery flexibility improve migration confidence?

A: Flexible recovery options, such as in-place and out-of-place restores, can help teams quickly recover workloads if something goes wrong. This adaptability helps reduce downtime and enables organizations to adjust migration plans without risking data integrity.

Q: How can organizations reduce complexity during infrastructure transitions?

A: By adopting a unified data protection platform, organizations can manage all workloads – virtualized and containerized – through a single interface. This approach helps reduce tool sprawl, simplify administration, and maintain consistent governance across evolving environments.

Jason Gizaè Senior Manager del reparto Global Content Partner Marketing presso Commvault.

Punti di forza

• La la Readiverse Academy ha introdotto un percorso di certificazione strutturato e articolato in livelli, che spazia dalle conoscenze di base alle competenze avanzate cloud .
• Le certificazioni sono in linea con i ruoli professionali reali e consentono ai partecipanti di sviluppare competenze pertinenti alle loro responsabilità negli Cloud Commvault Cloud .
• The program includes four tiers – Practitioner, Specialist, Professional, and Expert – each increasing in depth and operational capability.
• L’apprendimento si articola attorno a tre pilastri fondamentali: platform , cyber resilience e workload .
• Le opzioni di formazione flessibili, che comprendono sia corsi autogestiti che tenuti da un docente, consentono ai professionisti di progredire in base ai propri impegni e ai propri obiettivi.

The environments you protect with Commvault® Cloud are increasingly complex, and the expectations on your teams that run them are higher than ever. It’s no longer just about knowing the platform. It’s about being able to operate, protect, and recover, often under pressure.

If you’ve already started your learning journey in the la Readiverse Academy, welcome back. And if you’re new here, you’re joining at the right time.

Today, we’re introducing a structured, tiered certification approach that gives learners a clear, skill‑based path from foundational platform knowledge to advanced cloud engineering expertise.

Creiamo contenuti su misura per te

Commvault Cloud environments demand expertise across multiple responsibilities, often within the same role. Administrators, security specialists, cloud engineers, and workload owners require different depths and breadths of knowledge. And not everyone needs to learn the same things, in the same order, to be effective.

The new la Readiverse Academy certification tiers reflect that reality. Learners progress through clearly defined levels that build on one another so that your certification aligns to what you actually do and validates those capabilities to the teams you work with.

• Commvault Cloud Practitioner – foundational platform and resilience knowledge.
• Commvault Cloud Specialist – expanded operational and security depth.
• Commvault Cloud Professional – advanced recovery and workload expertise.
• Commvault Cloud Expert – full cloud engineering and resilience leadership.

Each tier is earned through a combination of coursework, hands‑on lab activities, and validated assessments. As learners progress, the scope and depth of operational capability demonstrated increases accordingly.

Un percorso chiaro: da principiante a esperto

Il programma di certificazione si articola attorno a tre pilastri fondamentali di competenze che caratterizzano ogni livello:

• platform di base platform
• Concetti di resilienza informatica
• Workload competenze specifiche

Ogni livello prevede requisiti specifici relativi a tali pilastri. Gli studenti possono seguire singoli corsi oppure combinare i requisiti indicati per raggiungere gli obiettivi di certificazione.

Already in la Readiverse Academy? What this Means for You.

With a new structure like this, the most important question is what it means for the progress you’ve already made. If you’ve already completed courses or earned certifications in the la Readiverse Academy, congratulations! Your investment matters, and we want to be clear about what happens next.

Those certifications represent your history and accomplishments with Commvault. The new program is aligned to our expanded portfolio of cyber resilience features for Commvault Software, Commvault SaaS, and hybrid environments. As your needs grow to require more from Commvault, these courses and certifications will help you configure, manage, and optimize Commvault to meet your organization’s unique needs.

There is no direct progression from the previous certification tracks to the new program, but your existing certifications validate your expertise on the former product releases. As those releases are retired, those certifications will reach end of life as well. Learners who are already invested in the la Readiverse Academy are well positioned to progress quickly.

Who Should Take la Readiverse Academy Courses and Certifications

la Readiverse Academy certifications are designed for professionals working across Commvault SaaS, Commvault Software, and hybrid environments.

• Platform administrators managing day‑to‑day operations.
• Specialisti della sicurezza specializzati nella protezione dei dati e nel rafforzamento della sicurezza degli ambienti.
• Cloud responsabili della configurazione del piano di controllo e della resilienza avanzata.
• Workload che devono possedere competenze in ambiti specifici relativi ai dati.

All training is available for self‑paced learning, with select courses also offered in instructor‑led formats, so learners can progress in a way that fits their role and schedule.

Come iniziare o proseguire il proprio percorso di apprendimento

Whether you’re starting fresh or continuing your journey, the next step is simple and designed to meet you where you are.

• Accedi o registrati sucommvault.com.
• Non conosci ancora Commvault? Inizia con il corso “Commvault Cloud ”.
• Ti occupi del workload ? Dai un’occhiata al nostro catalogo di corsi che coprono praticamente ogni argomento.
• Cerchi strategie per favorire il ripristino dopo un attacco informatico? Il corso sulla resilienza informatica è il punto di partenza ideale.

Cosa ci aspetta

Our goal is to make advancement predictable, transparent, and aligned to real‑world roles to help learners know what’s next and how to prepare for it.

We are committed to giving every Commvault Cloud user the knowledge to operate, protect, and recover their environment with confidence. Because when it matters most, certification isn’t about credentials. It’s about being resilient and ready to recover.

Domande frequenti

Q: What is the purpose of the la Readiverse Academy certification program?

A: The program provides a structured, skill-based learning path that helps professionals progress from basic platform knowledge to advanced cloud engineering expertise. It aligns training with real-world responsibilities to enable learners to apply their knowledge effectively in complex environments.

Q: What are the different certification tiers available?

A: There are four tiers: Commvault Cloud Practitioner, Specialist, Professional, and Expert. Each level builds on the previous one, increasing in technical depth, operational scope, and leadership capability.

Q: Who should enroll in la Readiverse Academy courses?

A: The courses are designed for platform administrators, security specialists, cloud engineers, and workload owners working across SaaS, software, and hybrid environments. Each role can follow a tailored learning path based on their responsibilities.

Q: How are the certifications earned?

A: Certifications are achieved through a combination of coursework, hands-on labs, and validated assessments. As learners progress, they demonstrate increasing levels of expertise across platform, security, and workload domains.

Q: What happens to existing la Readiverse Academy certifications?

A: Existing certifications remain valid as proof of past expertise but are tied to earlier product releases. As those releases are retired, the certifications will reach end of life, encouraging learners to transition to the new program.

Q: How can someone get started with the new program?

A: New learners can begin with the Commvault Cloud Administrator course, while existing users can log in to continue their progress. Additional courses are available based on specific goals, such as workload management or cyber resilience strategies.

Suzanne Klausner is Director, Customer Enablement Strategy, at Commvault.

Punti di forza

• La maggior parte delle esercitazioni teoriche serve a confermare l’efficacia delle prestazioni anziché mettere in luce le reali lacune nella risposta agli incidenti.
• Affinché gli esercizi siano efficaci, devono prevedere elementi di attrito, ambiguità e pressione, in modo da rispecchiare le situazioni reali.
• Limitare l’ambito dell’esercizio a pochi scenari critici e definire il successo come l’individuazione dei problemi piuttosto che come il semplice risultato di fare bella figura può portare a intuizioni più significative e concrete.
• La partecipazione trasversale, e non solo quella dei team tecnici, è fondamentale per valutare con precisione la risposta dell’organizzazione.
• La vera resilienza si dimostra attraverso test di ripristino concreti, non solo con scenari teorici.

There is a moment most security leaders recognize, even if they do not say it out loud. The tabletop just wrapped. The team is filing out. Everyone looks reasonably satisfied. And somewhere in the back of your mind, a quiet question surfaces: Did we actually learn anything?

If you are honest, the answer is often no.
That is not because tabletop exercises are a bad idea. They are one of the most valuable tools a security leader has. The problem is how most organizations run them – and what they are actually measuring when they do.

La trappola delle prestazioni

The most common mistake in tabletop exercises has nothing to do with the scenario. It has to do with the goal. Most teams, consciously or not, build exercises designed to demonstrate competence rather than discover gaps.
The scenario generally follows a clean arc. Information arrives in a logical sequence. The right people say the right things. Everyone feels prepared. And that feeling – confident, well-rehearsed, almost collegial – is exactly the problem.
Real incidents do not run on clean arcs. They arrive with incomplete information, conflicting signals, unavailable people, and a business demanding answers faster than the facts support. If your tabletop does not create that kind of friction, you have not tested incident response. You have practiced a conversation.
When the exercise is designed to validate rather than stress-test, a second problem follows: People stop being honest. Nobody says, “I don’t know who owns that decision” or “we have never actually tested that recovery path.” They say what sounds right. And the gaps that should surface in a controlled environment stay hidden until they surface in a real one.

Cosa verifica effettivamente un buon esercizio

Before you build a scenario, you need to answer a simpler question: What do you actually want to learn? Not 20 things. Three or four.
Can your team make a shutdown decision fast enough, and does everyone know who has the authority to make it? When security, IT, legal, and communications are all in the room with conflicting priorities, can they actually reach decisions together? Can you explain the business impact of an incident clearly enough for leadership to act – not just understand? And if you had to restore a critical system in the next four hours, could you really do it?

Once you know what you are testing, build a scenario with real friction. Make a key person unavailable mid-exercise. Introduce a customer escalation. Have a regulator ask a question the team cannot answer from the runbook.
Give people incomplete information and see how they make decisions anyway. The value is not in watching people succeed under pressure. It is in finding the places where the process breaks down while the stakes are still low enough to fix it.

Dite questo ad alta voce all’inizio: oggi il successo significa individuare i problemi, non fare bella figura. Quella sola frase cambia ciò che le persone sono disposte a dire in quella stanza.

Il problema delle persone

Una simulazione che coinvolga solo i reparti di sicurezza e IT è una discussione tecnica, non un’esercitazione di risposta agli incidenti. Se l’ufficio legale non è presente, se l’ufficio comunicazioni non è presente, se i responsabili di business e la dirigenza sono assenti, non state testando come la vostra organizzazione risponda effettivamente a una crisi. State solo verificando come un gruppo ristretto di persone competenti analizzi un caso ipotetico. Gli incidenti reali vengono gestiti a tutti i livelli dell’azienda. L’esercitazione dovrebbe rispecchiare questa realtà.

Parlarne non basta

This is where most organizations stop short. A paper exercise is important – but it is not confidence.
Talking through a recovery scenario tells you something. Actually restoring a system tells you something different. Can you bring identity back to a clean point in time? Can you validate that what you are recovering is trustworthy? Can you restore a Tier 1 application and confirm it comes back cleanly, without carrying the infection with it?

Those are not questions you can answer in a conference room. At some point, the plan has to meet the environment – and you need to know whether they match.

Al termine dell’esercitazione

The debrief tells you whether the exercise mattered. If the hot wash is quiet, vague, or full of “good reminders,” the exercise did not push hard enough. A well-run tabletop should leave you with a short list of real findings, clear owners, and deadlines. If you cannot answer what broke, who is fixing it, and by when, you ran an event, not an exercise.
The goal was never to pass the exercise. It was to learn something important while the cost of being wrong was still just time.
Watch our recent episode of the STRIVE podcast, where I join my colleague Chris Mierzwa, Senior Director, Portfolio Marketing, for una conversazione approfondita sulle esercitazioni teoriche.

Domande frequenti

Q: Why do most tabletop exercises fail to deliver real value?

A: Many exercises are designed to make teams look prepared rather than uncover weaknesses. This leads to scripted discussions that miss the unpredictability and pressure of real incidents.

Q: What should a tabletop exercise aim to achieve?

A: It should focus on answering a small number of critical questions, such as decision-making speed, ownership clarity, and recovery capability. This focus helps teams uncover meaningful gaps instead of surface-level insights.

Q: How can organizations make exercises more realistic?

A: Introduce uncertainty, missing information, and unexpected disruptions during the scenario. These elements force teams to think critically and act under pressure, closer to real incident conditions.

Q: Who should be involved in a tabletop exercise?

A: Beyond security and IT, teams like legal and communications, business leaders, and executives should participate. This enables the exercise to reflect how real incidents are managed across the organization.

Q: Why is talking through recovery not enough?

A: Discussion can highlight plans, but only real testing proves whether systems actually can be restored cleanly and quickly. Practical validation is necessary to confirm recovery readiness.

Q: What defines a successful tabletop exercise outcome?

A: A strong exercise results in clear findings, assigned owners, and defined timelines for remediation. If these are missing, the exercise likely did not challenge the team enough.

Chris Bevil is Principal, Global Cyber Resilience & AI, at Commvault.

Every organization that has ever failed a recovery – and there are more than anyone publicly acknowledges – had one thing in common: They believed they could recover before they tried.

The belief came from somewhere. A completed tabletop exercise. A backup system that showed green. An annual disaster recovery test that passed. All of it documented. All of it, at some point, accurate. None of it current when the incident actually hit.

This is the confidence gap. And it is the gap that continuous recovery validation is designed to close.

What ‘Testing’ Actually Means in Most Organizations

Ask most security or IT leaders how often they test their recovery capability, and the answer is typically annual, sometimes biannual. The test involves restoring a subset of systems from backup into a test environment, confirming they come up, and filing a report. Sometimes a tabletop exercise is conducted alongside it.

What this kind of testing does not do: validate that backup data is free of malware. Confirm that recovery sequencing works for interdependent services. Test identity recovery, which is essential when compromised credentials are what enabled the attack. Confirm that the team that would actually run the recovery knows the current runbooks. Or produce evidence meaningful enough to satisfy a regulator, an auditor, or a board that recovery capability is real and current.

In short, it validates a point in time. Resilience operations (ResOps) requires validation as a continuous state.

The Continuous Validation Model

Continuous recovery validation is not a single test run more frequently. It is a set of integrated practices that produce ongoing, evidence-based proof of recoverability across critical services.

Automated backup integrity scanning. Every backup, continuously evaluated for anomalies, encryption patterns, and malware signatures. Not at restore time – before restore time. The goal is to know whether your recovery points are clean before you need them, not during an incident.

Scheduled Cleanroom Recovery drills. Bi-annual at minimum, restoring from immutable backup points into an isolated Cleanroom Recovery environment – not production, not a production-adjacent test environment, but a genuinely isolated space where forensic analysis can happen without risk of reinfection. These drills produce documented evidence of recoverability against defined impact tolerances.

Identity recovery validation. With credential abuse the most common breach vector, Active Directory and Entra ID recovery must be tested alongside data recovery. Organizations that restore systems without restoring a verified-clean identity layer may find attackers re-enter through the same door.

Service Resilience Indicator (SRI) dashboards. SRIs – continuous signals drawn from backup telemetry, dependency mapping, and test results – that give CISOs, CIOs, and boards a live view of recoverability posture. Not a point-in-time report. An ongoing operational signal.

Each of these practices feeds what Deloitte and Commvault call the resilience backlog: a continuously updated, prioritized list of gaps identified through testing and tracked to resolution. It is the mechanism by which validation drives improvement rather than just producing reports.

What Mean Time to Clean Recovery Changes

Traditional recovery metrics – recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) – measure speed and data recency. They say nothing about whether the data being restored can be trusted. Mean Time to Clean Recovery (MTCR) fills that gap: It measures the time required to restore data that is verifiably clean, not just technically available.

MTCR matters because in a ransomware incident, the adversary’s goal is often to corrupt recovery options, not just encrypt production systems. An organization that restores quickly but restores from a compromised backup has not recovered. It has re-infected itself.

Building MTCR into your resilience measurement framework, alongside RTO and RPO, changes what you optimize for and what you report to the board. Speed plus recency plus integrity: that is the complete picture of recovery readiness.

Resilience You Can Prove

The organizations that navigate cyber disruptions with the least damage share one characteristic: They treat recovery capability as something to be continuously demonstrated, not periodically asserted. They know their MTCR. Their SRIs are current. Their cleanroom recovery has been tested in the last 90 days.

That posture is not the result of better technology alone. It is the result of an operating discipline – ResOps – that makes resilience continuous, measurable, and governable. Commvault’s platform provides the technical foundation: clean recovery, automated validation, and the unified visibility across data, identity, and services that ResOps requires at scale.

For the organizational side of that equation – how to define impact tolerances, align executive leadership, and build the governance structure that sustains the discipline – see the Deloitte companion blog, The Resilience Conversation Your Board Isn’t Having Yet. And for the complete ResOps framework, including the six ResOps domains and the measurement model that ties technical recoverability to board-level accountability, read the joint whitepaper:From Minimum Viability to Operational Resilience: ResOps in Practice.Bill O’Connell is Chief Security Officer at Commvault.

Punti di forza:

• Gli attacchi informatici prendono sempre più di mira sia gli ambienti di produzione che quelli di backup, rendendo indispensabile un ripristino pulito e verificabile.
• Il rilevamento integrato di anomalie e minacce rafforza cyber resilience i dati compromessi, verificando i punti di ripristino affidabili e accelerando il ripristino.
• Se integrate nei flussi di lavoro relativi alla protezione dei dati, le funzionalità di rilevamento delle anomalie e delle minacce possono contribuire a fornire le prove necessarie per garantire un ripristino rapido, sicuro e affidabile.

Perché la resilienza informatica dipende dal rilevamento integrato di anomalie e minacce

Anomaly detection identifies unusual behavior in backup data that may indicate compromise. Threat detection identifies known malicious activity using signatures, heuristic analysis, and scanning techniques. Together, they help validate recovery points and enable clean data recovery.

For years, security leaders focused on preventing breaches. In today’s era of persistent attacks and AI-driven threats, organizations increasingly assume compromise and design systems that can withstand disruption and recover safely when it occurs.

Modern adversaries don’t always hide their presence – they reveal it when it serves their objective. Attackers try to infiltrate environments quietly, observe systems over time, and position themselves inside critical infrastructure. The moment an attack becomes visible is rarely the moment it begins; it is the moment the attacker chooses to act.

By then, compromised data may already be woven into backup copies. Integrated anomaly and threat detection can help organizations identify compromised backup data, validate clean recovery points, and assist recovery after a cyberattack.

For security and IT teams, the challenge is no longer simply detecting an attack but predicting and managing an attacker’s possible impact. Understanding what was affected, what remains trustworthy, and how the organization can recover safely without escalating business disruption is the solution.

This is why cyber resilience benefits tremendously from integrated anomaly and threat detection. When detection capabilities are embedded into data protection and recovery workflows, they help provide the shared intelligence that teams need to identify compromised data, validate trusted recovery points, and guide response decisions with evidence rather than guesswork.

This approach aligns with the emerging ResOps™ operating modeldi nuova concezione, in cui i team di sicurezza, IT e ripristino operano sulla base di una visione d’insieme condivisa e di percorsi di ripristino convalidati per rispondere congiuntamente agli incidenti.

La nuova realtà: la ripresa richiede prove concrete, non supposizioni

Traditional threat detection tools focus on spotting threats along the perimeter. But once attackers are inside, visibility can become fragmented and determining which systems and data have been affected becomes a challenge.

Further, attackers increasingly target backup environments specifically to undermine recovery. And the moment organizations cannot confidently prove that backups remain untouched, suspicion becomes unavoidable. The result is uncertainty. Restore quickly and risk reinfection? Or delay recovery while investigating which copies remain trustworthy? IT teams are forced to guess which data is safe while downtime accumulates.

By building intelligence directly into data protection workflows, anomaly and threat detection helps transform recovery from a reactive guess into a disciplined, evidence-driven process. These capabilities can help organizations pinpoint tampered copies, validate data cleanliness, and assemble the most recent uncompromised recovery points – helping you accelerate cyber recovery and reduce operational impact.

Rilevamento delle anomalie: il tuo primo segnale di ciò che non conosci

Anomaly detection acts as a sentinel, guarding your protected data integrity. It establishes a baseline of normal behavior – file sizes, growth patterns, deduplication changes, access attempts – and alerts teams when something deviates from that norm. These deviations can surface signs of silent tampering long before malware signatures do. In an era of novel and polymorphic threats, anomaly detection helps offer what static tools can’t: visibility into the unexpected.

Rilevamento delle minacce: difesa mirata contro attività dannose note

While anomalies reveal what’s unusual, threat detection exposes what is malicious. By scanning protected data directly for ransomware, malware signatures, encryption patterns, and custom indicators of compromise (IoCs), threat detection helps validate that the data you protect is not already compromised.

Perché è importante un approccio combinato

Né il rilevamento delle anomalie né quello delle minacce, da soli, forniscono un quadro completo della situazione. Insieme, costituiscono una strategia di difesa a più livelli: il rilevamento delle anomalie può evidenziare segnali sospetti, mentre quello delle minacce può approfondire l’analisi per verificare l’esistenza di intenzioni malevole. Questa combinazione aiuta le organizzazioni a distinguere le anomalie innocue dalle vere e proprie violazioni e a disporre di dati affidabili e convalidati per un ripristino rapido.

Meeting Today’s Challenges with Commvault® Cloud

Gli hacker prendono sempre più di mira gli ambienti di backup e il malware nascosto nei dati di backup può aumentare il rischio di reinfezione durante il ripristino. Le organizzazioni hanno bisogno di una verifica basata sui dati per garantire un ripristino sicuro e affidabile.Commvault Cloud addresses this by combining data protection workflows with anomaly detection, threat intelligence, AI-enabled analytics, and isolated clean instances. With anomaly and threat insights applied before, during, and after backup operations, Commvault can help empower organizations to recover faster, cleaner, and confidently.

Read the full white paper, “Can You Prove You’re Recoverable Right Now?”.

Domande frequenti

Q: What is anomaly detection in data protection?

A: Anomaly detection identifies unusual behaviors – such as unexpected backup size changes or abnormal file activity – that may signal tampering, ransomware, or emerging threats within protected data.

Q: Why do CISOs need threat detection in their backup workflows?

A: Backup environments are now prime attacker targets. Threat detection helps prevent organizations from storing or restoring compromised data, which helps reduce reinfection risk and improve chances for clean recovery.

Q: How does Commvault help enable clean data recovery?

A: Commvault uses AI-assisted threat scanning, encryption detection, custom IoC matching, and cyber deception to help validate backup integrity and assemble the most recent uncompromised data for rapid recovery.

Q: Why combine anomaly and threat detection?

A: Anomalies identify the unknown; threat detection validates the known. Together, they provide comprehensive visibility into suspicious activity, helping enable faster investigation and more confident data recovery.

Elenco di Paulineè responsabile del marketing di prodotto presso Commvault

Punti di forza

• Rising operational disruption makes scalable resilience essential, but organizations commonly fall into traps like seeking “silver bullet” technology or relying on “hero worship” of individual experts.
• ResOps offre un framework scalabile che integra persone, processi e tecnologia nei settori ITOps, SecOps e DevOps.
• Il sostegno da parte dei vertici aziendali, a livello di amministratore delegato, contribuisce a rafforzare la responsabilità e a dare priorità alla resilienza come disciplina strategica.

Cyberattacks, cloud complexity, and AI-enabled threats are creating constant operational challenges for enterprises. To help meet business requirements in this increasingly disruptive environment, organizations need to move beyond separate recovery tools, teams, and plans to resilience as an integrated operating model.

In a recent webinar, Phil Goodwin, research vice president for IDC’s worldwide infrastructure programs, joined me for a fireside chat to explore how organizations can move beyond fragmented approaches to build resilience that scales.

Perché le organizzazioni hanno bisogno di un nuovo quadro di riferimento per la resilienza

As organizations engage in daily firefighting while keeping up with new technologies and addressing new initiatives, they rarely have time to step back and reassess whether their approaches still meet requirements. But as isolated incidents become systemic disruption, this conversation has become essential.

In a simpler era, organizations focused primarily on backup and recovery. Large-scale disruptions such as Hurricane Sandy brought disaster recovery onto the agenda. Intensifying cyberthreats like ransomware added cyber resilience and business continuity to the list. Each evolution brought new capabilities, but many organizations simply bolted new approaches onto what they were already doing rather than addressing these expanding requirements holistically.

When separate teams manage different pieces with different tools and policies, gaps may emerge that can slow recovery. Despite years of investment in cybersecurity, organizations are still struggling with recovery.

More recently, AI has accelerated the urgency for a more integrated approach by reshaping both threats and defenses. Despite increasing AI investments, many businesses are delaying AI rollouts due to ongoing concerns about governance and security vulnerabilities.

On the other side of the cyber front, bad actors are using AI to create deepfakes, target users with more sophisticated and convincing phishing, and exploit vulnerabilities at scale.

Resilience operations – ResOps – treats resilience as a continuous operating discipline rather than a collection of separate tools and teams. By bringing together ITOps, SecOps, and DevOps under a unified framework, ResOps helps transform resilience to keep pace with systemic disruption.

Come evitare gli errori più comuni nella pianificazione della resilienza

Even organizations that recognize the need for change often fall into traps. One is the “silver bullet” problem, which focuses on technology as the solution. Leaders want to believe that buying the right tools will solve everything, but technology alone can’t deliver positive business outcomes without proper integration and process.

“Hero worship” is another common pitfall – relying on talented staff members with expertise residing in their heads rather than in documented processes. Heroism can’t scale, and reliance on specific individuals creates vulnerability when people leave or responsibilities shift.

To move past these traps, you have to think differently about your operating model. Instead of focusing primarily on technology and people, consider the team you’ll need to build, including executive sponsorship, IT operations and security leadership, and senior leaders from the business side.

The team’s charter should focus on defining business outcomes first: What does resilience need to achieve for the organization? What KPIs, SLAs, and processes should be established to meet these requirements?

Sviluppare la resilienza con un approccio dall’alto verso il basso

Essendo una priorità a livello di consiglio di amministrazione, la resilienza richiede il sostegno dei vertici aziendali. Il programma ResOps ottiene i risultati migliori quando il CEO è coinvolto, contribuendo a definire le priorità in termini di risorse e promuovendo la responsabilizzazione in tutta l’organizzazione. Una volta assicurato il sostegno dei vertici aziendali, i dirigenti senior, tra cui il CIO, il CTO, il CISO e i direttori generali, possono incaricare il proprio personale di occuparsi dell’attuazione.

Questo approccio può essere applicato a organizzazioni di qualsiasi dimensione. Anche le piccole e medie imprese possono costituire team interfunzionali che includano i principali attori aziendali, i team IT e il personale incaricato della sicurezza dei dati e della rete. Man mano che crescono, questa struttura può adattarsi alle loro esigenze, potenziando il personale in specifici settori legati alla resilienza, pur mantenendo un approccio integrato lungo tutta la catena operativa della resilienza. Le ResOps riflettono le modalità con cui i team delle operazioni IT, SecOps e DevOps devono collaborare all’interno delle organizzazioni. Il recupero dei dati e la sicurezza dei dati sono diventati così strettamente correlati che, all’interno di IDC, i ricercatori di queste discipline collaborano ormai frequentemente sui progetti dei clienti. Oggi le applicazioni devono essere progettate tenendo conto degli autori delle minacce, integrando architetture “zero trust” e partendo dal presupposto che qualcosa possa andare storto. ResOps fornisce il quadro di riferimento per questa convergenza, riunendo gli strumenti di sicurezza e operativi in un modello unificato per affrontare minacce e interruzioni di ogni tipo.

ResOps come quadro di riferimento condiviso per il settore

ResOps is an operating model, not a product, and can benefit companies regardless of the specific tools they use. As Phil observed during our chat, “It really requires that community involvement where people pitch in from different perspectives, different vendors, different organizations, and different teams, just like DevOps or SecOps.”

For organizations struggling with constant disruption and the growing complexity of AI-enabled threats and defenses, ResOps offers a path beyond fragmented resilience approaches. By bringing together people, processes, and technology in a unified operating model, ResOps turns fragmented recovery efforts into enterprise-wide readiness.

Watch my chiacchierata informale completa con Phil perscoprire come ResOps può aiutarti a sviluppare una resilienza aziendale scalabile.

Domande frequenti

Q: What is resilience operations (ResOps)?

A: ResOps is an operating model that integrates IT operations, security operations, and DevOps into a continuous discipline. Rather than treating disaster recovery, cyber resilience, and business continuity as separate capabilities, ResOps brings people, processes, and technology together under a unified framework to help create scalable enterprise resilience.

Q: Why is executive sponsorship important for cyber resilience?

A: Executive sponsorship – ideally at the CEO level – helps drive accountability and priority for resilience initiatives across the organization. This top-down support is essential for organizations trying to move beyond fragmented approaches to integrated resilience operations.

Q: Can small and midsized organizations implement ResOps?

A: Yes. ResOps applies across organization sizes. The framework scales in complexity as organizations grow, making it accessible to mid-market firms while remaining effective for large enterprises.

Q: Why do IT and security teams need to work together for resilience?

A: When IT operations, security operations, and DevOps teams collaborate rather than work in silos, organizations can help build more resilient infrastructure to address evolving threats.

Q: How should organizations get started with resilience operations?

A: Start at the top by securing executive sponsorship at the CEO level. Next, form a cross-functional team including IT operations, SecOps, and business stakeholders, and have them define the business outcomes resilience needs to deliver for your business. Conduct a threat assessment to understand the risks you need to address. Only after these foundational steps should organizations focus on selecting technologies and developing detailed processes.

Chris Mierzwa is Senior Director, Portfolio Marketing, at Commvault.