When ransomware strikes or systems fail, the effectiveness of your recovery doesn’t just depend on technology – it hinges on people working together across organizational boundaries. Despite the critical importance of alignment, significant gaps persist between cybersecurity teams and business leadership, undermining organizational resilience when it matters most.
This article explores how to build the organizational alignment necessary for effective cyber resilience, connecting technical teams with business leadership to create a unified approach to recovery.
The Organizational Challenge in Cyber Resilience
The most critical barrier to effective cyber resilience isn’t technological – it’s organizational. Research reveals alarming disconnects between cybersecurity leaders and the executives who control resources and strategic direction:
Board-Level Misalignment and Understanding Gaps
Harvard Business Review research from 2025 found that “many boards overestimate their company’s cybersecurity readiness while underestimating the strategic importance of their own role in shaping it.” The research reveals “a gap between perceived cyber investment and true board-level understanding, reflecting a broader misalignment: too many directors see themselves as growth strategists rather than stewards of long-term resilience.”
Communication and Credibility Gaps
Operational communication barriers persist between cybersecurity teams and business stakeholders. McKinsey research shows that while cybersecurity spending has increased dramatically – with organizations spending approximately $200 billion in 2024 compared to $140 billion in 2020 – many organizations still struggle with basic alignment between security teams and business units. This spending increase hasn’t necessarily translated to better organizational coordination.
CISO Role Evolution and Authority Gaps
The State of the CISO, 2023–2024, Report from IANS Research and Artico Search reveals a key challenge CISOs face: “Despite the role expectations being elevated to C-Level, CISOs struggle to be viewed as such, and the CISO role is frequently not part of the senior leadership team.”
However, the research found that “CISO satisfaction positively correlated with access and influence at the board level,” with CISOs who have strong board relationships feeling “more valued and generally report they are ‘heard,’ even when there are disagreements on budgeting.”
Limited Executive Access and Influence
Despite the strategic importance of cybersecurity, many CISOs lack meaningful access to senior leadership. The State of the CISO report cited above also revealed that only 20% of CISOs are positioned at the C-level in their organizational hierarchy, with 63% holding vice president- or director-level positions.More telling, 90% of CISOs are at least two organizational levels removed from the CEO.
Even among large organizations, access remains limited. Among companies with annual revenues exceeding $10 billion, only 60% of CISOs meet regularly with boards.
The Three Pillars of Organizational Alignment
With the challenges outlined above, it’s no surprise that there is thrash and uncertainty when it comes to how to actually build operational resilience into the business and ultimately respond to and recover from cybersecurity incidents. So where can teams start?
Building effective alignment for cyber resilience requires addressing three core areas:
1. Governance and Decision Rights
Resilience requires clear governance structures that define who makes which decisions:
Executive sponsorship:
Decision frameworks:
Cross-functional oversight
2. Roles and Responsibilities
Clearly defined roles eliminate confusion during high-stress incidents:
Incident response roles:
Recovery-specific responsibilities:
RACI Matrix Development
3. Communication and Collaboration
Effective communication bridges the gap between technical and business stakeholders:
Common language development:
Communication protocols:
Collaboration mechanisms
Building a Cross-Functional Resilience Culture
Beyond structures and processes, effective resilience requires a supportive organizational culture. Every level of the organization needs to know that they play a part in making sure the organization can withstand operational and cyber incidents. To help prepare company leadership for its role in building this culture, you should think about these components:
Executive Engagement Strategies
Success starts at the top with leadership that understands and prioritizes resilience:
Education approaches:
Metrics that matter to leadership:
Board-level reporting:
Middle Management Alignment
Middle managers often serve as critical connectors between technical teams and leadership and must be brought into the fold early in order to be prepared for any eventuality. Here are some good places that your leadership team can focus to help make middle management a driver of your resilience:
Resilience champions program:
Business unit integration:
Performance integration:
Technical Team Empowerment
Technical teams need both authority and guidance to execute effectively:
Decision authority frameworks:
Skill development programs:
Recognition and incentives:
Practical Alignment Methods
Building alignment requires concrete actions. Here are practical methods organizations can implement:
1. Joint business impact analysis (BIA)
One of the most effective alignment tools is a collaborative BIA:
Cross-functional BIA workshops:
Outcome documentation:
2. Tabletop exercises
Scenario-based exercises build shared understanding across organizational boundaries:
Cross-functional exercise design:
Exercise facilitation:
Post-exercise action planning
3. Recovery plan translation
Effective plans bridge the gap between technical and business languages:
Business-focused plan elements:
Technical-business translation components:
Integrated documentation:
Measuring Alignment Effectiveness
To ensure alignment efforts are working, organizations should track specific metrics:
Process metrics:
Perception metrics:
Outcome metrics:
Regular measurement of these metrics provides insight into alignment effectiveness and highlights areas for improvement.
Implementation Roadmap
For organizations looking to improve stakeholder alignment, consider this phased approach:
Phase 1: Assessment (1–2 months)
Phase 2: Foundation Building (2–4 months)
Phase 3: Capability Development (4–8 months)
Phase 4: Optimization (8+ months)
Alignment as Competitive Advantage
As cyber threats continue to evolve, the ability to coordinate effectively across organizational boundaries will likely become an even more critical differentiator between organizations that maintain continuous business and those that suffer extended disruption.
By implementing structured approaches to governance, roles, and communication, organizations can significantly enhance their resilience posture and build the human foundation necessary for effective recovery.
Learn More
Watch our webinar “Cracking the Code: Recover 99% Faster from Cyber Attacks” to learn how you can improve your cyber recovery plan and minimize downtime.
And check out these other blogs in our series on cyber resilience and minimum viability:
![Thumbnail_Blog_Multi-Layered-Approach-2025[98]](https://www.commvault.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Thumbnail_Blog_Multi-Layered-Approach-202598-1.png)
